Product names are useful for browsing, but a purchasing file often needs more precise references. Keeping model-level information separate from batch-level information makes a record easier to review and share.

Separate the model from the production details

FDA describes a unique device identifier (UDI) as a code generally containing two parts. The device identifier (DI) identifies the labeler and a particular device version or model. The production identifier (PI), when present, can include information such as a lot number, serial number or expiration date. These fields serve different purposes and should not be combined into a single informal product nickname.

Use public identification records as a reference

AccessGUDID is a public resource for looking up device identification information submitted to FDA. It can be accessed without an account. FDA explains that GUDID contains device identifiers, not production identifiers; a database search therefore does not replace the batch details on the item being reviewed.

Build a clear reference sheet

For an internal research file, consider separate fields for the supplier’s product name, model reference, labeler, DI where available, and the source document or label photograph. Record the date you checked the information. If a field is missing, mark it as unconfirmed rather than inferring a value from a similar model.

This is an information-management overview, not a determination of any product’s regulatory status or suitability. No UDI or database entry is claimed here for a SUM Medical Global product. For model-specific questions, use our contact details.

Sources: FDA: UDI basics; FDA: AccessGUDID for the public. Reviewed 16 September 2026.